are we moving towards the "unworking" of the community to a degree that it ceases to be a "workable" concept altogether…..???
Fragments from the last meeting with Taru:
- The Inpoerative Community=
Less target led
Not based on an identity
Moving away from the core essence
-Interesting thing about failure is when omething comes out of it in a constructive way
-Agamben on community:
Doing away with ideas of the essential community and rethinking all other terms
-Negative Vibes
-Idea of fake utopia
-Circles etc undermining a hippy ideology
-calling squatting fake etc
-moving things fast (our community)
-microwaving intimacy
-the group has been testing out different modes of the intimate community
…following methods of intimacy, tracking methods/methodologies for creating community/intimacy
…exploring what comes out of these practices, whether they are forced, real, effective
-INOPERATIVE COMMUNITY concept can be a loose hook for us to frame and push our research further…
… should continue with our highly practical work method “EXPRESSION GIVES US A METHOD”
a “stammering” practice
stuttering, cut ups
- at the presentation we NEED TO DEMONSTRATE A CRITICAL ARMATURE
-statement
-presentation
-discussion
(the discussion is a vital part of the overall presentation and requires us to back up our presentation with ideas, concepts, methodologies)
q. Taru asked us:
How do you describe this work as a research?
What is the relationship between our practice and theory?
How can you describe your practice as a research method?
In order for us to answer her questions we will do a divination ritual/a mapping/a rearrangement, arrangement of our ideas, research, ephemera….
Her final words were: Keep on doing stuff, keep on reflecting
See you all tomorrow
BRING LOTS OF STUFF
-amal